Saturday, 30 November 2013





Renégats et traîtres ‘musulmans’ au service de

la France sioniste et franc-maçonnique!
  Renégats et traîtres ‘musulmans’ au service   de la France sioniste et franc-maçonnique!


Anthony Lawson

 24 July 1922 – National Home for the Jewish people but no infringement on Palestinial right and sovereignty

Dear Mr Lawson,

It is by far the best short exposé of the matter I have ever come across. Having studied in the U.S.S.R. between 1964 and 1968, with so many Jewish university comrades, personal friends, teachers, I understood one thing from the very mouth of my host Michael Stepanovitch Drinkin of Kislovodsk: We Jews are going to take over America.  Not a single mention about the suffering of Jews was ever made or of the “Holocaust”.
All was about establishing the dictatorship of the people over the rest of the world by the money Jews and Zionists.

May God bless you for your courage and honesty.

Yours sincerely
Basheer A. Frémaux-Soormally



UN GRAND MERCI AU Dr Salim Laibi - Le Libre Penseur 

Le Vrai visage de Tariq Ramadan

Maghreb Humiliated 3 - HD


Published on 25 Aug 2013
Nouvelle Petite mise au point du Libre Penseur sur le cas Tariq Ramadan...
Simple efficace & subversif, Salim Laibi usant comme à son habitude,d'un bon sens irréfutable, pour démasquer le "théologien musulman" ...

Extrait de Maghreb Humiliated III
J'attend vos retours, critiques et soutiens avec intérêt après avoir visionner cette vidéo


Je n’ai personnellement rencontré que très peu de Musulmans dans ma chienne de vie!   
Donc, je suis à 100% d’accord avec le Dr Salim Laïbi !

  Basheer Ahmad

Thursday, 28 November 2013


thanksgiving dinner prayer 




Manataka American Indian 


by Susan Bates

Most of us associate the holiday with happy Pilgrims and Indians sitting down to a big feast.  And that did happen - once. 
The story began in 1614 when a band of English explorers sailed home to  England with a ship full of Patuxet Indians bound for slavery. They left behind smallpox which virtually wiped out those who had escaped.  By the time the Pilgrims arrived in Massachusetts Bay they found only one living Patuxet Indian, a man named Squanto who had survived slavery in England and knew their language.  He taught them to grow corn and to fish, and negotiated a peace treaty between the Pilgrims and the Wampanoag Nation. At the end of their first year, the Pilgrims held a great feast honoring Squanto and the Wampanoags. 
But as word spread in England about the paradise to be found in the new world, religious zealots called Puritans began arriving by the boat load. Finding no fences around the land, they considered it to be in the public domain. Joined by other British settlers, they seized land, capturing strong young Natives for slaves and killing the rest.  But the Pequot Nation had not agreed to the peace treaty Squanto had negotiated and they fought back. The Pequot War was one of the bloodiest Indian wars ever fought.  
In 1637 near present day  Groton, Connecticut, over 700 men, women and children of the Pequot Tribe had gathered for their annual Green Corn Festival which is our Thanksgiving celebration. In the predawn hours the sleeping Indians were surrounded by English and Dutch mercenaries who ordered them to come outside.  Those who came out were shot or clubbed to death while the terrified women and children who huddled inside the longhouse were burned alive. The next day the governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony declared "A Day Of Thanksgiving" because 700 unarmed men, women and children had been murdered.
Cheered by their "victory", the brave colonists and their Indian allies attacked village after village. Women and children over 14 were sold into slavery while the rest were murdered.  Boats loaded with a many as 500 slaves regularly left the ports of New England. Bounties were paid for Indian scalps to encourage as many deaths as possible.   
Following an especially successful raid against the Pequot in what is now  Stamford, Connecticut, the churches announced a second day of "thanksgiving" to celebrate victory over the heathen savages.  During the feasting, the hacked off heads of Natives were kicked through the streets like soccer balls.  Even the friendly Wampanoag did not escape the madness. Their chief was beheaded, and his head impaled on a pole in Plymouth, Massachusetts -- where it remained on display for 24 years.   
The killings became more and more frenzied, with days of thanksgiving feasts being held after each successful massacre. George Washington finally suggested that only one day of Thanksgiving per year be set aside instead of celebrating each and every massacre. Later Abraham Lincoln decreed Thanksgiving Day to be a legal national holiday during the Civil War -- on the same day he ordered troops to march against the starving Sioux in Minnesota.
This story doesn't have quite the same fuzzy feelings associated with it as the one where the Indians and Pilgrims are all sitting down together at the big feast.  But we need to learn our true history so it won't ever be repeated.  Next  Thanksgiving, when you gather with your loved ones to Thank God for all your blessings, think about those people who only wanted to live their lives and raise their families.  They, also took time out to say "thank you" to Creator for all their blessings.
Our Thanks to Hill & Holler Column by Susan Bates

Chuck Larsen
This is a particularly difficult introduction to write. I have been a public schools teacher for twelve years, and I am also a historian and have written several books on American and Native American history. I also just happen to be Quebeque French, Metis, Ojibwa, and Iroquois. Because my Indian ancestors were on both sides of the struggle between the Puritans and the New England Indians and I am well versed in my cultural heritage and history both as an Anishnabeg (Algokin) and Hodenosione (Iroquois), it was felt that I could bring a unique insight to the project.

For an Indian, who is also a school teacher, Thanksgiving was never an easy holiday for me to deal with in class. I sometimes have felt like I learned too much about "the Pilgrims and the Indians." Every year I have been faced with the professional and moral dilemma of just how to be honest and informative with my children at Thanksgiving without passing on historical distortions, and racial and cultural stereotypes.

The problem is that part of what you and I learned in our own childhood about the "Pilgrims" and "Squanto" and the "First Thanksgiving" is a mixture of both history and myth. But the THEME of Thanksgiving has truth and integrity far above and beyond what we and our forebearers have made of it. Thanksgiving is a bigger concept than just the story of the founding of the Plymouth Plantation.

So what do we teach to our children? We usually pass on unquestioned what we all received in our own childhood classrooms. I have come to know both the truths and the myths about our "First Thanksgiving," and I feel we need to try to reach beyond the myths to some degree of historic truth. This text is an attempt to do this.

At this point you are probably asking, "What is the big deal about Thanksgiving and the Pilgrims?" "What does this guy mean by a mixture of truths and myth?" That is just what this introduction is all about. I propose that there may be a good deal that many of us do not know about our Thanksgiving holiday and also about the "First Thanksgiving" story. I also propose that what most of us have learned about the Pilgrims and the Indians who were at the first Thanksgiving at Plymouth Plantation is only part of the truth. When you build a lesson on only half of the information, then you are not teaching the whole truth. That is why I used the word myth. So where do you start to find out more about the holiday and our modern stories about how it began?

A good place to start is with a very important book, "The Invasion of America," by Francis Jennings. It is a very authoritative text on the settlement of New England and the evolution of Indian/White relations in the New England colonies. I also recommend looking up any good text on British history. Check out the British Civil War of 1621-1642, Oliver Cromwell, and the Puritan uprising of 1653 which ended parliamentary government in England until 1660. The history of the Puritan experience in New England really should not be separated from the history of the Puritan experience in England. You should also realize that the "Pilgrims" were a sub sect, or splinter group, of the Puritan movement. They came to America to achieve on this continent what their Puritan bretheran continued to strive for in England; and when the Puritans were forced from England, they came to New England and soon absorbed the original "Pilgrims."

As the editor, I have read all the texts listed in our bibliography, and many more, in preparing this material for you. I want you to read some of these books. So let me use my editorial license to deliberately provoke you a little. When comparing the events stirred on by the Puritans in England with accounts of Puritan/Pilgrim activities in New England in the same era, several provocative things suggest themselves:

1. The Puritans were not just simple religious conservatives persecuted by the King and the Church of England for their unorthodox beliefs. They were political revolutionaries who not only intended to overthrow the government of England, but who actually did so in 1649.

2. The Puritan "Pilgrims" who came to New England were not simply refugees who decided to "put their fate in God's hands" in the "empty wilderness" of North America, as a generation of Hollywood movies taught us. In any culture at any time, settlers on a frontier are most often outcasts and fugitives who, in some way or other, do not fit into the mainstream of their society. This is not to imply that people who settle on frontiers have no redeeming qualities such as bravery, etc., but that the images of nobility that we associate with the Puritans are at least in part the good "P.R." efforts of later writers who have romanticized them.
(1) It is also very plausible that this unnaturally noble image of the Puritans is all wrapped up with the mythology of "Noble Civilization" vs. "Savagery."(2) At any rate, mainstream Englishmen considered the Pilgrims to be deliberate religious dropouts who intended to found a new nation completely independent from non-Puritan England. In 1643 the Puritan/Pilgrims declared themselves an independent confederacy, one hundred and forty-three years before the American Revolution. They believed in the imminent occurrence of Armegeddon in Europe and hoped to establish here in the new world the "Kingdom of God" foretold in the book of Revelation. They diverged from their Puritan brethren who remained in England only in that they held little real hope of ever being able to successfully overthrow the King and Parliament and, thereby, impose their "Rule of Saints" (strict Puritan orthodoxy) on the rest of the British people. So they came to America not just in one ship (the Mayflower) but in a hundred others as well, with every intention of taking the land away from its native people to build their prophesied "Holy Kingdom."(3)

3. The Pilgrims were not just innocent refugees from religious persecution. They were victims of bigotry in England, but some of them were themselves religious bigots by our modern standards. The Puritans and the Pilgrims saw themselves as the "Chosen Elect" mentioned in the book of Revelation. They strove to "purify" first themselves and then everyone else of everything they did not accept in their own interpretation of scripture. Later New England Puritans used any means, including deceptions, treachery, torture, war, and genocide to achieve that end.
(4) They saw themselves as fighting a holy war against Satan, and everyone who disagreed with them was the enemy. This rigid fundamentalism was transmitted to America by the Plymouth colonists, and it sheds a very different light on the "Pilgrim" image we have of them. This is best illustrated in the written text of the Thanksgiving sermon delivered at Plymouth in 1623 by "Mather the Elder." In it, Mather the Elder gave special thanks to God for the devastating plague of smallpox which wiped out the majority of the Wampanoag Indians who had been their benefactors. He praised God for destroying "chiefly young men and children, the very seeds of increase, thus clearing the forests to make way for a better growth", i.e., the Pilgrims.(5) In as much as these Indians were the Pilgrim's benefactors, and Squanto, in particular, was the instrument of their salvation that first year, how are we to interpret this apparent callousness towards their misfortune?

4. The Wampanoag Indians were not the "friendly savages" some of us were told about when we were in the primary grades. Nor were they invited out of the goodness of the Pilgrims' hearts to share the fruits of the Pilgrims' harvest in a demonstration of Christian charity and interracial brotherhood. The Wampanoag were members of a widespread confederacy of Algonkian-speaking peoples known as the League of the Delaware. For six hundred years they had been defending themselves from my other ancestors, the Iroquois, and for the last hundred years they had also had encounters with European fishermen and explorers but especially with European slavers, who had been raiding their coastal villages.
(6) They knew something of the power of the white people, and they did not fully trust them. But their religion taught that they were to give charity to the helpless and hospitality to anyone who came to them with empty hands.(7) Also, Squanto, the Indian hero of the Thanksgiving story, had a very real love for a British explorer named John Weymouth, who had become a second father to him several years before the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth. Clearly, Squanto saw these Pilgrims as Weymouth's people.(8) To the Pilgrims the Indians were heathens and, therefore, the natural instruments of the Devil. Squanto, as the only educated and baptized Christian among the Wampanoag, was seen as merely an instrument of God, set in the wilderness to provide for the survival of His chosen people, the Pilgrims. The Indians were comparatively powerful and, therefore, dangerous; and they were to be courted until the next ships arrived with more Pilgrim colonists and the balance of power shifted. The Wampanoag were actually invited to that Thanksgiving feast for the purpose of negotiating a treaty that would secure the lands of the Plymouth Plantation for the Pilgrims. It should also be noted that the INDIANS, possibly out of a sense of charity toward their hosts, ended up bringing the majority of the food for the feast.(9)

5. A generation later, after the balance of power had indeed shifted, the Indian and White children of that Thanksgiving were striving to kill each other in the genocidal conflict known as King Philip's War. At the end of that conflict most of the New England Indians were either exterminated or refugees among the French in Canada, or they were sold into slavery in the Carolinas by the Puritans. So successful was this early trade in Indian slaves that several Puritan ship owners in Boston began the practice of raiding the Ivory Coast of Africa for black slaves to sell to the proprietary colonies of the South, thus founding the American-based slave trade.

Obviously there is a lot more to the story of Indian/Puritan relations in New England than in the thanksgiving stories we heard as children. Our contemporary mix of myth and history about the "First" Thanksgiving at Plymouth developed in the 1890s and early 1900s. Our country was desperately trying to pull together its many diverse peoples into a common national identity. To many writers and educators at the end of the last century and the beginning of this one, this also meant having a common national history. This was the era of the "melting pot" theory of social progress, and public education was a major tool for social unity. It was with this in mind that the federal government declared the last Thursday in November as the legal holiday of Thanksgiving in 1898.

In consequence, what started as an inspirational bit of New England folklore, soon grew into the full-fledged American Thanksgiving we now know. It emerged complete with stereotyped Indians and stereotyped Whites, incomplete history, and a mythical significance as our "First Thanksgiving." But was it really our FIRST American Thanksgiving?

Now that I have deliberately provoked you with some new information and different opinions, please take the time to read some of the texts in our bibliography. I want to encourage you to read further and form your own opinions. There really is a TRUE Thanksgiving story of Plymouth Plantation. But I strongly suggest that there always has been a Thanksgiving story of some kind or other for as long as there have been human beings. There was also a "First" Thanksgiving in America, but it was celebrated thirty thousand years ago.
At some time during the New Stone Age (beginning about ten thousand years ago) Thanksgiving became associated with giving thanks to God for the harvests of the land. Thanksgiving has always been a time of people coming together, so thanks has also been offered for that gift of fellowship between us all.  Every last Thursday in November we now partake in one of the OLDEST and most UNIVERSAL of human celebrations, and THERE ARE MANY THANKSGIVING STORIES TO TELL.

As for Thanksgiving week at Plymouth Plantation in 1621, the friendship was guarded and not always sincere, and the peace was very soon abused. But for three days in New England's history, peace and friendship were there.

So here is a story for your children. It is as kind and gentle a balance of historic truth and positive inspiration as its writers and this editor can make it out to be. I hope it will adequately serve its purpose both for you and your students, and I also hope this work will encourage you to look both deeper and farther, for Thanksgiving is Thanksgiving all around the world.

Chuck Larsen Tacoma Public Schools September, 1986

(1) See Berkhofer, Jr., R.F., "The White Man's Indian," references to Puritans, pp. 27, 80-85, 90, 104, & 130.

(2) See Berkhofer, Jr., R.F., "The White Man's Indian," references to frontier concepts of savagery in index. Also see Jennings, Francis, "The Invasion of America," the myth of savagery, pp. 6-12, 15-16, & 109-110.

(3) See Blitzer, Charles, "Age of Kings," Great Ages of Man series, references to Puritanism, pp. 141, 144 & 145-46. Also see Jennings, Francis, "The Invasion of America," references to Puritan human motives, pp. 4-6, 43- 44 and 53.

(4) See "Chronicles of American Indian Protest," pp. 6-10. Also see Armstrong, Virginia I., "I Have Spoken," reference to Cannonchet and his village, p. 6. Also see Jennings, Francis, "The Invasion of America," Chapter 9 "Savage War," Chapter 13 "We must Burn Them," and Chapter 17 "Outrage Bloody and Barbarous."

(5) See "Chronicles of American Indian Protest," pp. 6-9. Also see Berkhofer, Jr., R.F., "The White Man's Indian," the comments of Cotton Mather, pp. 37 & 82-83.

(6) See Larsen, Charles M., "The Real Thanksgiving," pp. 3-4. Also see Graff, Steward and Polly Ann, "Squanto, Indian Adventurer." Also see "Handbook of North American Indians," Vol. 15, the reference to Squanto on p. 82.

(7) See Benton-Banai, Edward, "The Mishomis Book," as a reference on general "Anishinabe" (the Algonkin speaking peoples) religious beliefs and practices. Also see Larsen, Charles M., "The Real Thanksgiving," reference to religious life on p. 1.

(8) See Graff, Stewart and Polly Ann, "Squanto, Indian Adventurer." Also see Larsen, Charles M., "The Real Thanksgiving." Also see Bradford, Sir William, "Of Plymouth Plantation," and "Mourt's Relation."

(9) See Larsen, Charles M., "The Real Thanksgiving," the letter of Edward Winslow dated 1622, pp. 5-6.

(10) See "Handbook of North American Indians," Vol. 15, pp. 177-78. Also see "Chronicles of American Indian Protest," p. 9, the reference to the enslavement of King Philip's family. Also see Larsen, Charles, M., "The Real Thanksgiving," pp. 8-11, "Destruction of the Massachusetts Indians."

(11) Best current estimate of the first entry of people into the Americas confirmed by archaeological evidence that is datable.

By Chuck Larsen

When the Pilgrims crossed the Atlantic Ocean in 1620, they landed on the rocky shores of a territory that was inhabited by the Wampanoag (Wam pa NO ag) Indians. The Wampanoags were part of the Algonkian-speaking peoples, a large group that was part of the Woodland Culture area. These Indians lived in villages along the coast of what is now Massachusetts and Rhode Island. They lived in round- roofed houses called wigwams. These were made of poles covered with flat sheets of elm or birch bark. Wigwams differ in construction from tipis that were used by Indians of the Great Plains.

The Wampanoags moved several times during each year in order to get food. In the spring they would fish in the rivers for salmon and herring. In the planting season they moved to the forest to hunt deer and other animals. After the end of the hunting season people moved inland where there was greater protection from the weather. From December to April they lived on food that they stored during the earlier months.

The basic dress for men was the breech clout, a length of deerskin looped over a belt in back and in front. Women wore deerskin wrap-around skirts. Deerskin leggings and fur capes made from deer, beaver, otter, and bear skins gave protection during the colder seasons, and deerskin moccasins were worn on the feet. Both men and women usually braided their hair and a single feather was often worn in the back of the hair by men. They did not have the large feathered headdresses worn by people in the Plains Culture area.

There were two language groups of Indians in New England at this time. The Iroquois were neighbors to the Algonkian-speaking people. Leaders of the Algonquin and Iroquois people were called "sachems" (SAY chems). Each village had its own sachem and tribal council. Political power flowed upward from the people. Any individual, man or woman, could participate, but among the Algonquins more political power was held by men. Among the Iroquois, however, women held the deciding vote in the final selection of who would represent the group. Both men and women enforced the laws of the village and helped solve problems. The details of their democratic system were so impressive that about 150 years later Benjamin Franklin invited the Iroquois to Albany, New York, to explain their system to a delegation who then developed the "Albany Plan of Union." This document later served as a model for the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.

These Indians of the Eastern Woodlands called the turtle, the deer and the fish their brothers. They respected the forest and everything in it as equals. Whenever a hunter made a kill, he was careful to leave behind some bones or meat as a spiritual offering, to help other animals survive. Not to do so would be considered greedy. The Wampanoags also treated each other with respect. Any visitor to a Wampanoag home was provided with a share of whatever food the family had, even if the supply was low. This same courtesy was extended to the Pilgrims when they met.

We can only guess what the Wampanoags must have thought when they first saw the strange ships of the Pilgrims arriving on their shores. But their custom was to help visitors, and they treated the newcomers with courtesy. It was mainly because of their kindness that the Pilgrims survived at all. The wheat the Pilgrims had brought with them to plant would not grow in the rocky soil. They needed to learn new ways for a new world, and the man who came to help them was called "Tisquantum" (Tis SKWAN tum) or "Squanto" (SKWAN toe).

Squanto was originally from the village of Patuxet (Pa TUK et) and a member of the Pokanokit Wampanoag nation. Patuxet once stood on the exact site where the Pilgrims built Plymouth. In 1605, fifteen years before the Pilgrims came, Squanto went to England with a friendly English explorer named John Weymouth. He had many adventures and learned to speak English. Squanto came back to New England with Captain Weymouth. Later Squanto was captured by a British slaver who raided the village and sold Squanto to the Spanish in the Caribbean Islands. A Spanish Franciscan priest befriended Squanto and helped him to get to Spain and later on a ship to England. Squanto then found Captain Weymouth, who paid his way back to his homeland. In England Squanto met Samoset of the Wabanake (Wab NAH key) Tribe, who had also left his native home with an English explorer. They both returned together to Patuxet in 1620. When they arrived, the village was deserted and there were skeletons everywhere. Everyone in the village had died from an illness the English slavers had left behind. Squanto and Samoset went to stay with a neighboring village of Wampanoags.

One year later, in the spring, Squanto and Samoset were hunting along the beach near Patuxet. They were startled to see people from England in their deserted village. For several days, they stayed nearby observing the newcomers. Finally they decided to approach them. Samoset walked into the village and said "welcome," Squanto soon joined him. The Pilgrims were very surprised to meet two Indians who spoke English.

The Pilgrims were not in good condition. They were living in dirt-covered shelters, there was a shortage of food, and nearly half of them had died during the winter. They obviously needed help and the two men were a welcome sight. Squanto, who probably knew more English than any other Indian in North America at that time, decided to stay with the Pilgrims for the next few months and teach them how to survive in this new place. He brought them deer meat and beaver skins. He taught them how to cultivate corn and other new vegetables and how to build Indian-style houses. He pointed out poisonous plants and showed how other plants could be used as medicine. He explained how to dig and cook clams, how to get sap from the maple trees, use fish for fertilizer, and dozens of other skills needed for their survival.

By the time fall arrived things were going much better for the Pilgrims, thanks to the help they had received. The corn they planted had grown well. There was enough food to last the winter. They were living comfortably in their Indian-style wigwams and had also managed to build one European-style building out of squared logs. This was their church. They were now in better health, and they knew more about surviving in this new land. The Pilgrims decided to have a thanksgiving feast to celebrate their good fortune. They had observed thanksgiving feasts in November as religious obligations in England for many years before coming to the New World.

The Algonkian tribes held six thanksgiving festivals during the year. The beginning of the Algonkian year was marked by the Maple Dance which gave thanks to the Creator for the maple tree and its syrup. This ceremony occurred when the weather was warm enough for the sap to run in the maple trees, sometimes as early as February. Second was the planting feast, where the seeds were blessed. The strawberry festival was next, celebrating the first fruits of the season. Summer brought the green corn festival to give thanks for the ripening corn. In late fall, the harvest festival gave thanks for the food they had grown. Mid-winter was the last ceremony of the old year. When the Indians sat down to the "first Thanksgiving" with the Pilgrims, it was really the fifth thanksgiving of the year for them!

Captain Miles Standish, the leader of the Pilgrims, invited Squanto, Samoset, Massasoit (the leader of the Wampanoags), and their immediate families to join them for a celebration, but they had no idea how big Indian families could be. As the Thanksgiving feast began, the Pilgrims were overwhelmed at the large turnout of ninety relatives that Squanto and Samoset brought with them. The Pilgrims were not prepared to feed a gathering of people that large for three days. Seeing this, Massasoit gave orders to his men within the first hour of his arrival to go home and get more food. Thus it happened that the Indians supplied the majority of the food: Five deer, many wild turkeys, fish, beans, squash, corn soup, corn bread, and berries. Captain Standish sat at one end of a long table and the Clan Chief Massasoit sat at the other end. For the first time the Wampanoag people were sitting at a table to eat instead of on mats or furs spread on the ground. The Indian women sat together with the Indian men to eat. The Pilgrim women, however, stood quietly behind the table and waited until after their men had eaten, since that was their custom.

For three days the Wampanoags feasted with the Pilgrims. It was a special time of friendship between two very different groups of people. A peace and friendship agreement was made between Massasoit and Miles Standish giving the Pilgrims the clearing in the forest where the old Patuxet village once stood to build their new town of Plymouth.

It would be very good to say that this friendship lasted a long time; but, unfortunately, that was not to be. More English people came to America, and they were not in need of help from the Indians as were the original Pilgrims. Many of the newcomers forgot the help the Indians had given them. Mistrust started to grow and the friendship weakened. The Pilgrims started telling their Indian neighbors that their Indian religion and Indian customs were wrong. The Pilgrims displayed an intolerance toward the Indian religion similar to the intolerance displayed toward the less popular religions in Europe. The relationship deteriorated and within a few years the children of the people who ate together at the first Thanksgiving were killing one another in what came to be called King Phillip's War.

It is sad to think that this happened, but it is important to understand all of the story and not just the happy part. Today the town of Plymouth Rock has a Thanksgiving ceremony each year in remembrance of the first Thanksgiving. There are still Wampanoag people living in Massachusetts. In 1970, they asked one of them to speak at the ceremony to mark the 350th anniversary of the Pilgrim's arrival. Here is part of what was said:

"Today is a time of celebrating for you -- a time of looking back to the first days of white people in America. But it is not a time of celebrating for me. It is with a heavy heart that I look back upon what happened to my People. When the Pilgrims arrived, we, the Wampanoags, welcomed them with open arms, little knowing that it was the beginning of the end. That before 50 years were to pass, the Wampanoag would no longer be a tribe. That we and other Indians living near the settlers would be killed by their guns or dead from diseases that we caught from them. Let us always remember, the Indian is and was just as human as the white people.

Although our way of life is almost gone, we, the Wampanoags, still walk the lands of Massachusetts. What has happened cannot be changed. But today we work toward a better America, a more Indian America where people and nature once again are important."


Wednesday, 27 November 2013




ROMAN POLANSKI, Franco-Polish Rajmund or Raymond Roman Thierry Liebling) world famous and globally protected Jewish supremacist and pedophile awarded countless awards!!!

(Un Oscar du meilleur réalisateur, deux Golden Globes, une Palme d'or au festival de Cannes, trois Bafta, un Ours d'or au festival de Berlin et sept Césars… : Roman Polanski est l'un des cinéastes vivants les plus récompensés)

The Jewish War on Christmas! Christmas traditions banned—Jewish symbols erected

Every year, the world’s biggest Menorah stands right across from the White House on government property.
During the Christmas season Menorahs are displayed on prime public property across the United States. Thousands of Menorahs are placed in front of town halls, federal buildings and schools.
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that Jewish Menorahs are allowed, but Christian-themed scenes and deco-rated crosses must be banned.


Even beautiful Christmas carols that have been sung since the earliest days of America are now banned in most schools.

Although it may come as a surprise to some Americans, the effort to destroy Christmas traditions has been led by the organized Jewish community. The American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the ADL and a host of powerful Jewish groups have led the attack against Christmas.
The ACLU is also active. Since its inception the ACLU has been dominated by Jewish lawyers and Jewish funding.

To put it bluntly, the war on Christmas has been led by Jewish organizations, financed by Jewish financiers, fought in the courts by Jewish lawyers, and lobbied in government, by Jewish influence. Underlying the whole campaign is the Jewish dominated media. Extremist Jews who make up less than three percent of the population have prevailed over the wishes of 90 percent of the American people.

The war against Christmas has been fought for decades. Jewish groups first forced a ban on any prayer in school. Then they forbade moments of silence for fear that kids might pray. Then they stopped any crèche or cross in public areas at Christmas time.

Their next step was to re-strict the mention of Christ-mas itself in institutions, transforming “Christmas” to “Winter Holidays” and” and “Winter Break.” Then the singing of Christmas carols in schools. Now, they replace Christian Christmas symbols with open Jewish symbols!


This cultural war extends to all of our ancient European traditions. They are banned or slandered in deference to “Jewish sensibilities. “

Jewish-led media has had a crucial role in supporting this attack on our traditions and in blunting our resistance. Doubters of Jewish media control, should read The Los Angeles Jewish Times (Oct. 29, 1999) where it boasted that four out of five of the largest media conglomerates are directly owned by Jews and the fifth is as pro-Zionist-controlled as the other four.

Perhaps nothing exposes the Jewish extremist power over us more than the fact that at the same time they have supported banning Christmas Christian displays and Christ-mas carols, they have quietly replaced them with Jewish Menorahs and the celebration of obviously Judaic Hanukkah racism on public property.
Here is a quote from “Nativity Scenes” in Wikipedia:

Nativity scenes have provoked controversies and lawsuits. In federal court pleadings in the United States, for example, the New York City, New York, school system defended its ban on nativity scenes…the judge in the case upheld the ban, noting that the ban on nativity scenes is not discriminatory while permitting Jewish Menorahs and the Islamic star and crescent…In another instance, a suburban Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States school banned a nativity scene while permitting a Menorah display. The school’s principal stated, “Judaism is not just a religion, it’s a culture.” 

To say that a Menorah is not a religious symbol is, of course, absurd. Here is a quote from the prominent Jewish website, Judaism 101:

One of the oldest symbols of the Jewish faith is the Menorah . . . It has been the most recognizable symbol of Judaism from ancient times. 

Interestingly enough, at the same time symbols of the birth of Jesus are torn down, symbols of anti-Christian Judaism are erected.

Judaism teaches that Christ was an idolater and that idolaters should be murdered. Most Christians don’t know the fact that the chief Jewish religious book is the Talmud. It sets the entire course of law by which Jews must live, boasting that Jews themselves were the ones who executed Jesus, not the Romans. It also claims that Jewish priests in the afterworld have conjured up Jesus where they are boiling him in excrement for eternity. 


I know this sounds ludicrous and impossible to the average Christian today, but this Judaic hatred of Jesus is easily proven. Recently a book was published on that very subject by the head of Princeton University’s Jewish Studies Department, Peter Schafer, called Jesus in the Talmud. The book is endorsed by prominent Jewish rabbis. Here’s a quote from a review of the book in Publishers Weekly:

What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early manuscripts of the Babylonian Talmud, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin. … 

Jewish hatred of Christ and Christianity can be seen in a never-ending parade of vicious Jewish attacks on Jesus and Christianity in the media. It is illustrated by Larry David’s HBO television program “Curb Your Enthusiasm” where this Jew urinates on a picture of Jesus. Two pious Christian women are then mocked and ridiculed for thinking that the liquid on the face of Jesus is a tear.


It is impossible to list every Jewish anti-Christian effort, but some shocking evidence of deep Jewish hatred toward Christians is exposed in a paper by Jewish professor Nathan Abrams. In the Jewish Intellectual Quarterly Abrams boasts that Jews founded and still dominate pornographic films. He quotes Jewish porn kings saying that they are motivated by an “atavistic hatred” against our heritage:

Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. 

He goes on to quote one of the most famous Jewish pornographers, Al Goldstein:

Is there a deeper reason beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? 

Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.” Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and… penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream… 

The Jewish organization that erects the Menorah in front of the White House as well as thousands more across America and around the world is Chabad Lubavitch. Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization that even permitted to hold parties in the White House.

As the Jewish Talmud commands, Chabad hates and condemns Jesus Christ and Christians as “idolaters,” and it proclaims that Jews have a divine right to rule over Gentiles. The purpose of all Gentiles on earth, they say, is to “serve Jews.”

A leading Chabad rabbi, Yitzhak Ginsburg wrote in America’s largest Jewish newspaper, Jewish Week, April 26, 1996, that Jews even had the moral right to seize a gentile on the street and “take the liver of an innocent non-Jew,” if a Jew needed it.

Hanukkah Celebrates Jewish racism and mass murder! 

The Menorah symbolizes Hanukkah which represents Jewish separatism.

Let me quote to you from a typical Jewish account of it. I take this quote from Zipple: the Jewish Supersite. Here are some excerpts:

the eight-day holiday celebrates the Jewish military victory against the Syrians…, Underlying Chanukah is a theme just as central today as it was 2,000 years ago, the fight against assimilation. Today, just as then, Jews are well accepted; the Maccabees revolted not only against the ruling Syrians, but against the prevailing Jewish practice of Hellenization. 

“Hellenization” can today easily be interchanged for Americanization or assimilation.

Hanukkah celebrates the mass murder against both the Greeks and all Jews who married Greeks or accepted Greek culture.

Ironically, any group that opposed “assimilation” would be viciously condemned by the same pro-Hanukkah Jewish media!

Actually the sentiment of self-preservation is healthy and natural, for most people naturally want to preserve their heritage just as we all want to preserve the unique expressions of life

in Nature. But, if you are a European American and you say you want to preserve your people, you are condemned as a “racist” and “hater.”

If Jews say those same things, they get to erect racist, genocidal symbols that oppose assimilation — right next to the White House!

Ironic isn’t it? A manger scene of a child being born in the name of love and joy; for peace on earth and goodwill toward men — is banned. And what is it replaced by?

A symbol of Hanukkah celebrating the annihilation of Jewish enemies and fostering Jewish resistance to assimilation.

Don’t think it is only Jewish groups like Chabad who have these beliefs. Every major Jewish organization campaigns against inter-marriage and assimilation.

The American Jewish Committee has had national campaigns called “Jews don’t mix and match.” Posters have been put up all over the world by mainstream Jewish groups that show a Jewish girl who married a Gentile. They say she is now “LOST” to her people.


The national Jewish-dominated media excoriated one obscure Justice of the Peace in Louisiana who opposed mixed marriages of Whites and Blacks. Yet, the media tell us nothing about the fact that in the entire nation of Israel it is illegal for a Jew to marry a non-Jew. This Jewish law is not just primarily about religious intermarriage, it is aimed purely at the genetic heritage of Jews. An atheist, non-religious Jew, of which there are millions in Israel, can marry a religious Jew or another atheist Jew, as long as prove Jewish genealogical descent.

This the meaning of Hanukkah celebrated at the White House while Christian symbols are banned!
Any resistance Europeans have to the loss of our genetic and cultural heritage through assimilation and multiculturalism is called chauvinism, intolerance and ultimately “racism” by the media. On the other hand, Jewish ethnocentrism and mass murder is honored by putting up huge symbols of it in front of the White House each year!

Some may ask why the media doesn’t ex-pose this hypocrisy? It is easy to understand when you know that the media is run by the same group that celebrates Hanukkah racism!

Barack Obama will solemnize a Hanukkah celebration at the White House this year.

Imagine for a moment if there were a White House ceremony commemorating White opposition to assimilation and intermarriage with Jews? Would the media be silent?

So, how can Jewish extremists get away with this without any outcry in the press?

The blatant double standards reveal clearly the increasing Jewish power and influence over our media, government and culture.

And, it is not just the Christian traditions of Christmas that the ADL wants to eradicate. In their guide to teachers and parents, called the “December Dilemma” it tells Jews not to put up with any traditional Christmas symbols that hurt “diversity.” The ADL says:

In the context of displays on public property, the Supreme Court has ruled that a Christmas crèche standing alone is impermissible… It also has found that a Chanukah Menorah … is permissible.
In the next ADL passage, the ADL shows that it seeks to limit, not just Christian symbols, but the wider symbols of European heritage:


First, it is important to note that while Christmas trees, Santas, wreaths, wrapped gifts, and reindeer are commonly used… Nevertheless, their inordinate usage is inappropriate… Suggest alternative winter decorations…that may be more inclusive. 

A number of Jewish organizations have be-gun to go after that distinctly European Christmas tradition: the Christmas tree.

At Missouri State University, a 20-foot Christmas tree was taken down after Lorene Stone, dean of the College of Humanities, was told by the school “Diversity Commission” that a Jewish faculty member said the tree showed “a lack of sensitivity” to those of other religions.

Stone, who put the tree up the day before Thanksgiving, said she didn’t use any religious symbols on it. And then she invited Jews to erect a Menorah (even though a Menorah is obviously religious).
In Seattle, using the threat of a costly law-suit, a Jewish rabbi, Elazar Bogomilsky, forced the Seattle Airport to take down a number of large and beautiful Christmas trees it had erected for the holiday. Jewish intimidation such as at Missouri State and in Seattle signals the increasing removal of Christmas trees from public property across the United States.

Jewish Hollywood continues to produce films and TV programs that defile our European Christmas traditions. Even the venerable figure of Santa Claus or St. Nicklaus has not escaped Jewish hate.


In Seattle, Rabbi Bogomilsky’s attack on Christmas caused a tremendous backlash. A vast majority of Americans are sick and tired of these Jewish extremists trying to destroy our heritage.
There is a Jewish war raging against Christmas and against every true interest of our people. But, finally, our people are awakening!

The Jewish War on Christmas should awaken us that Christmas and everything else we hold dear is under brutal attack.

Special Three for Two Offer! An Ideal Christmas Present

Give the Gift of Knowledge to your Loved Ones! 

Get all three of Dr. David Duke’s books—autographed, hardcover, collector’s items—for just buying two of them in this limited special offer.
That’s right, you get autographed editions of My Awakening, Jewish Supremacism AND The Secret Behind Communism as a special gift set for the price of just two of the special autographed books.
Hurry, this special will not last forever!

Jewish Supremacists Being Exposed at Every Turn

Amidst all the bad news about the wild excesses of Jewish Supremacists in Israel and in America, the good news is that increasing numbers of ordinary people are drawing together the courage to speak out openly about the power of the Jewish lobby and its highly damaging effect on world affairs.
The latest such example has come with a new article written by Professor James A. Russell, an Associate Professor in the Department of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, where he is teaching courses on Middle East security affairs, nuclear proliferation, terrorism, and national security strategy.
Professor Russell’s articles have appeared in a wide variety of media and scholarly outlets around the world, and previously held a variety of positions in the Office of the Assistant Secretary Defense for International Security Affairs, Near East South Asia, Department of Defense. He is thus very much an establishment figure—which makes his latest article even more remarkable.
Writing in the LobeLog, the US foreign affairs blog of the international news wire service, IPS News (which is regularly cited in  various news outlets including the Economist, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the London Review of Books, TIME, the Daily Beast, the Atlantic, the American Conservative and the Guardian), Professor Russell has come right out with a frank discussion on the power of the Jewish lobby in determining American policy.

His article, titled “Whose Foreign Policy?” could not be clearer: “Whether we Americans like it or not, there is a profound struggle for control over our nation’s foreign policy in the Middle East. Push has finally come to shove, with the unseemly sight of Israeli government officials and AIPAC lobbyists fanning out on Capitol Hill to actively discredit the Obama’s administration’s attempt to craft a deal with Iran to bring the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program back under comprehensive international safeguards.

“After being supported for decades by tens of billions in American taxpayer dollars, free defense equipment, and unquestioning and limitless political support on countless occasions, Israel has shown its gratitude by biting the hand of its principal benefactor,” Professor Russell continued.

“All Americans both in and out of government would do well to consider an abiding truth in the standoff with Iran over its nuclear program: there is no military solution to this problem. Iran has the money, technical capability, and the infrastructure to build a nuclear weapon if chooses to do so. Bombing Iran to destroy a nuclear weapons program that the US intelligence community states does not exist only ensures that Iran will eventually build its own bomb. No amount of Israeli or US bombs can alter these essential realities.

“Israel’s leader Benjamin Netanyahu has staunchly and successfully opposed all attempts at peaceful accommodation with Israel’s enemies — aided and abetted by American money and political support. Netanyahu prefers the politics of confrontation that suit his interests and those of his political supporters on the right-wing of Israeli politics. This approach, however, does not serve American interests.

“There was a day when there was never a question about whether the United States was capable of going its own way and pursuing policies that primarily served its own interests. Today, there is no commonly accepted vision of America’s national interests as money has poured into our political process, serving the interests of the rich few — leaving most of the rest of the country behind.”

This is as far as Professor Russell dares to go—but everyone knows that the “money [which] has poured into our political process, serving the interests of the rich few” refers specifically to the Jewish Supremacists who make up the vast majority of campaign contributions in American politics.

Nonetheless, it is a welcoming sight to see increasing numbers of establishment figures finally publicly naming the Jewish lobby and pointing out that its activities are detrimental to American interests—and indeed the world’s.